Bangladesh's democratic framework has faced significant scrutiny, particularly under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina. The 2024 general election, held on 7 January 2024, has intensified concerns regarding the state of democracy in the country. This article explores the democratic crisis in Bangladesh, with a specific focus on the 2024 election, investigating allegations of electoral malpractice, corruption, and institutional weakening.
Historical and Political Context:
Background: Since gaining independence in 1971, Bangladesh has undergone various political transformations, including periods of military rule and democratic governance. Sheikh Hasina, leader of the Awami League, has been a dominant figure in Bangladeshi politics, leading the country through notable economic development but also facing significant allegations of authoritarianism and corruption.
The 2024 General Election:
Electoral Integrity and Allegations: The 2024 general election in Bangladesh has been marred by serious concerns over electoral integrity. Key issues include:
Allegations of Vote Rigging: Reports from both domestic and international observers have highlighted widespread vote rigging. There have been numerous allegations of ballot stuffing, tampering with voter rolls, and manipulation of vote counts. Observers have also reported discrepancies between official results and on-the-ground observations.
Violence and Intimidation: The election process was characterised by violence and intimidation, particularly targeting opposition candidates and their supporters. There were instances of clashes between political factions and reports of security forces being used to suppress dissent and favour the ruling party.
Impact on Democratic Legitimacy: The credibility of the 2024 election has been questioned, with many critics arguing that the results do not reflect the true will of the people. The overwhelming victory of Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League has been interpreted by some as a consequence of systematic electoral manipulation, further undermining confidence in the democratic process and raising concerns about the legitimacy of the government.
Corruption and Institutional Decay:
Corruption under Sheikh Hasina: Corruption remains a significant issue in Bangladesh, exacerbated under Sheikh Hasina’s administration. Key aspects include:
Nepotism and Patronage Networks: The concentration of power within the ruling Awami League has facilitated widespread nepotism and the establishment of patronage networks. High-profile corruption cases involving government officials and their associates have been reported, reflecting deep-seated issues of governance transparency.
Erosion of Accountability: The weakening of institutional checks and balances has allowed corruption to flourish. The judiciary and law enforcement agencies have been accused of bias and inefficiency, further entrenching the ruling party’s control and diminishing accountability mechanisms.
Institutional Weaknesses: The deterioration of democratic institutions is evident in several areas:
Judicial Impartiality: The independence of the judiciary has been compromised, with allegations of political interference in judicial appointments and decisions. This undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in the legal system.
Media Freedom: The space for independent media has diminished significantly. Journalists critical of the government face harassment, legal threats, and violence, while restrictive laws have been used to curb free speech and suppress critical reporting.
Human Rights and Civil Liberties:
Restrictions on Political Dissent: Human rights abuses in Bangladesh include severe restrictions on freedom of expression and political dissent. Key issues are:
Harassment of Opposition Figures: The political opposition has faced systematic repression, including arbitrary detentions, violence, and legal harassment. The government's approach to dissent undermines the democratic principle of political pluralism and restricts political competition.
Repression of Civil Society: Civil society organisations and activists have faced increasing repression. Legal and extralegal measures have been employed to stifle opposition voices and control public discourse, further constricting the space for civil society engagement.
Leadership Dynamics:
Sheikh Hasina's Governance: Sheikh Hasina’s leadership has been marked by substantial economic development but also by growing concerns over authoritarianism:
Centralisation of Power: The concentration of power within the executive branch and the ruling party has led to the erosion of democratic checks and balances. This centralisation facilitates the entrenchment of the ruling party and undermines democratic accountability.
Authoritarian Practices: The suppression of dissent, corruption, and manipulation of democratic processes reflect a broader trend towards autocratic governance. The 2024 election exemplifies these issues, highlighting the challenges facing Bangladeshi democracy.
The 2024 general election in Bangladesh has exposed profound and troubling dimensions of the country's democratic crisis. Allegations of electoral manipulation, widespread corruption, and institutional decay have cast a shadow over the legitimacy of the election results and the overall health of Bangladeshi democracy. Sheikh Hasina’s tenure, characterised by significant economic advancements, has been marred by increasingly authoritarian practices that undermine democratic norms and suppress dissent.
The persistence of these issues signals a critical juncture for Bangladesh. Restoring democratic integrity will require a concerted effort to address electoral malpractice, reinforce institutional checks and balances, and uphold the rule of law. Strengthening democratic institutions, ensuring transparency, and protecting civil liberties are imperative for rejuvenating public trust and fostering a genuine democratic environment.
The role of both domestic actors and the international community is crucial in supporting these reforms. By advocating for accountability and promoting human rights, stakeholders can contribute to a more transparent and equitable political system. The future of Bangladeshi democracy hinges on whether these challenges are met with meaningful action and a commitment to democratic principles.
References:
Human Rights Watch. (2024). World Report 2024: Bangladesh. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/bangladesh
Freedom House. (2024). Freedom in the World 2024: Bangladesh. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-world/2024
BBC News. (2024). Bangladesh elections: A critical juncture. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-64567892
The Economist. (2024). Bangladesh: The Struggle for Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2024/01/10/bangladesh-the-struggle-for-democracy
মাশাল্লাহ